Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Lenovo Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)
What Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (13) and where Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.9Graphics6.3
5.2Overall performance5.5
7.5Display9.4
3.5Memory & storage3.0
8.4Battery & portability6.0
7.3Features & cooling8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025)Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)
| Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025) | Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 221 mm | 244 mm | −23 mm |
| Width | 321.8 mm | 344 mm | −22.2 mm |
| Thickness | 17.3 mm | 19 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.9 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Resolution class3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Weight1.6 kg vs 1.87 kg+17%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,701 vs 9,372+14%
- GPU compute (FP32)15.3 TFLOPS vs 14.9 TFLOPS+3%
- GPU shader cores3,328 vs 2,560+30%
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- Vapor chamber coolingYes · Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026): No
- Thickness17.3 mm vs 19 mm+10%
- RAM speed8,533 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+52%
- Pixel density243 ppi vs 197 ppi+23%
Why is Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026) better than Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Brightness400 nits vs 1,000 nits2.5×
- GPU power (TGP)90 W vs 115 W+28%
- Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 80 Wh+5%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core620 vs 827+33%
- CPU threads8 vs 162×
- HDRNo · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- Upgradable RAMNo · Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
- Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 90 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 15.3 TFLOPS | 14.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,701 | 9,372 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 7 250 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 8 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 288V | Ryzen 7 250 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,013 | 11,126 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,816 | 2,550 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 620 | 827 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14″ | 15.3″ |
| Resolution | 2880 × 1800 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | 3K (1800p/2000p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 1,000 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 243 ppi | 197 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 8,533 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 140 W | 245 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.87 kg |
| Thickness | 17.3 mm | 19 mm |
| Width | 321.8 mm | 344 mm |
| Depth | 221 mm | 244 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 67 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | USB4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.6 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 14 RTX 5070 (2025)6.86.5vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5060 (2025)6.86.9vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Radeon 8060S (2025)6.87.0vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025)vsDell 16 Premium RTX 5070 (2025)6.86.6
vsAcer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025)6.86.8
vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025)5.46.8