Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023) vs HP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4050 (2023)
What Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (17) and where Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4050 (2023) wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Graphics3.6
7.2Overall performance6.8
6.1Display4.7
3.1Memory & storage6.4
4.9Battery & portability7.3
4.9Features & cooling5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023)Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4050 (2023)
| Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023) | Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 227 mm | 269 mm | −42 mm |
| Width | 313.5 mm | 356.6 mm | −43.1 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 19.8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 1.7 kg | 2.1 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)18.2 TFLOPS vs 11.4 TFLOPS+60%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light12,620 vs 8,049+57%
- GPU power (TGP)105 W vs 95 W+11%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 2,560+80%
- Weight1.7 kg vs 2.09 kg+23%
- USB-A ports3 vs 13×
- Response time3 ms vs 7 ms2.3×
- Video memory8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Brightness500 nits vs 400 nits+25%
- Advanced OptimusYes · Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4050 (2023): No
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- RAM typeLPDDR5 vs DDR5
Why is Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- SSD (up to)1,024 GB vs 4,096 GB4×
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 97 Wh+28%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core786 vs 1,317+68%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core12,144 vs 14,310+18%
- Upgradable RAMNo · Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
- USB-C ports1 vs 22×
- IR camera (face login)No · Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- CPU cores14 vs 16+14%
- CPU threads20 vs 24+20%
- Fan noise (max. load)56 dB vs 47 dB+19%
- Screen size14″ vs 16″+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 105 W | 95 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 18.2 TFLOPS | 11.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 12,620 | 8,049 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13700H | Core i7-13700HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-13700H | Core i7-13700HX, Core i7-14700HX, Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,144 | 14,310 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,633 | 2,578 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 786 | 1,317 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 162 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,000 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,024 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 97 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.7 kg | 2.09 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 19.8 mm |
| Width | 313.5 mm | 356.6 mm |
| Depth | 227 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Silver | White, Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 56 dB | 47 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | No |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)6.87.2
vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5060 (2025)6.86.7
vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsMSI Creator Z17 Studio RTX 4060 (2023)6.86.8
vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsDell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 (2023)6.86.7
vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsMSI Prestige 16 AI Studio B1V RTX 4070 (2023)6.86.9
vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 RTX 4060 (2023)6.86.8

