Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 RTX 4070 (2024) vs Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 18 RTX 4070 (2024) does better (3) and where Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025) wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.1Memory & storage2.4
Why is Predator Helios Neo 18 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 18 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 7,680+67%
- CPU cores16 vs 24+50%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 2,000 GB+95%
- Max CPU clock5.2 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 21.8 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 15,407 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-14650HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 24 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-14650HX, Core i7-14700HX, Core i9-14900HX | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 16,861 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,844 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,110 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Pixel density | 126 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3.25 kg | — |
| Thickness | 28.9 mm | — |
| Width | 404 mm | — |
| Depth | 311.6 mm | — |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 RTX 4070 (2024)vsGigabyte Gaming A18 RTX 5070 (2025)4.34.6vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G814 RTX 5070 (2025)4.34.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 RTX 4070 (2024)vsGigabyte Gaming A18 RTX 5050 (2025)4.34.4
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 18 PHN18-71 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 18 RTX 4070 (2024)3.94.3
vs
MSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
vsGigabyte Aorus Master 18 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)