Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025) vs Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025) does better (6) and where ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025) wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Graphics8.9
4.6Overall performance9.0
2.9Display9.8
5.1Memory & storage4.5
3.8Battery & portability2.7
5.2Features & cooling7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025)ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025) | ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 307.9 mm | 298 mm | +9.9 mm |
| Width | 401 mm | 399 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 32 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 3.3 kg | 3.3 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025) better than ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Advanced OptimusYes · ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- SD card readerYes · ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- Thickness28 mm vs 32 mm+14%
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 4,000 GB+2%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 1,000 GB+2%
Why is ROG Strix Scar 18 G835 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025)?
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light16,086 vs 30,125+87%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 300 Hz+82%
- Brightness300 nits vs 1,200 nits4×
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 10,4962.3×
- GPU compute (FP32)31.3 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS+64%
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 175 W+25%
- Video memory12 GB vs 24 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs 4K (2160p/2400p)
- Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED
- HDRNo · Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 31.3 TFLOPS | 51.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 16,086 | 30,125 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,016 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,081 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,885 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 3840 × 2400 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | 4K (2160p/2400p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 1,200 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 126 ppi | 168 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 380 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3.3 kg | 3.3 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 32 mm |
| Width | 401 mm | 399 mm |
| Depth | 307.9 mm | 298 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 53.7 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5070 (2025)5.15.6vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A18 FA808 RTX 5060 (2025)5.14.8vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G814 RTX 5070 (2025)5.14.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G814 RTX 5060 (2025)5.14.9vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI RTX 5060 (2026)5.15.0