- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Yoga Pro 9i 16 9 RTX 4060 (2024)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 9 RTX 4060 (2024)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (16) and where Yoga Pro 9i 16 9 RTX 4060 (2024) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
8.8Score
Higher score 16 advantages≈ $2,450
vs
9.0Graphics4.7
9.7Overall performance5.1
9.6Display6.9
7.0Memory & storage8.8
2.2Battery & portability4.0
4.8Features & cooling8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Yoga Pro 9i 16 9 RTX 4060 (2024)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Yoga Pro 9i 16 9 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 253.7 mm | +22.3 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 362.7 mm | −5.7 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 18.3 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Yoga Pro 9i 16 9 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light19,783 vs 8,7342.3×
- GPU compute (FP32)26.8 TFLOPS vs 12.3 TFLOPS2.2×
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 165 Hz+45%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 3,072+92%
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 100 W+15%
- CPU cores24 vs 14+71%
- Video memory12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Response time1 ms vs 21 ms21×
- Brightness500 nits vs 400 nits+25%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Yoga Pro 9i 16 9 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · Yoga Pro 9i 16 9 RTX 4060 (2024): No
Why is Yoga Pro 9i 16 9 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB4.1×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 84 Wh+11%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 2.18 kg+6%
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- Thickness20 mm vs 18.3 mm+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 236 ppi+25%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 7,467 MHz+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 100 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.8 TFLOPS | 12.3 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 19,783 | 8,734 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 5 125H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 14 |
| CPU threads | — | 18 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 5 125H, Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 10,097 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,130 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 711 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 3200 × 2000 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 21 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 236 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 7,467 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 84 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 170 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.18 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 18.3 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 362.7 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 253.7 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Gray, Green |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 53.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsRazer Blade 14 RTX 5060 (2025)8.89.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 (2025)8.89.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ RTX 5090 (2025)8.89.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5060 (2025)8.89.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2025)8.89.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsLenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 RTX 5070 (2025)8.89.1