NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023)

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Asus Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023)

What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (15) and where Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023) wins (14) — every spec side by side.

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
8.8Score
15 advantages≈ $2,450
vs
Asus Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023)
8.8Score
14 advantages
Higher score
9.0Graphics9.4
9.7Overall performance8.4
9.6Display8.5
7.0Memory & storage4.6
2.2Battery & portability6.4
4.8Features & cooling6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023)
357 × 27620355 × 25117.8
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023)Difference
Depth276 mm251 mm+25 mm
Width357 mm355 mm+2 mm
Thickness20 mm17.8 mm+2.2 mm
Weight2.3 kg2.4 kg−0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023)?

  1. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  2. RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
  3. MUX switchYes · Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023): No
  4. CPU cores24 vs 14+71%
  5. USB-A ports3 vs 13×
  6. Weight2.3 kg vs 2.4 kg+4%
  7. 3DMark Steel Nomad Light19,783 vs 19,370+2%
  8. G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023): No
  9. Advanced OptimusYes · Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023): No
  10. Upgradable RAMYes · Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023): No
  11. M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
  12. Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023): No

Why is Zenbook Pro 16X OLED UX7602 RTX 4080 (2023) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?

  1. Battery capacity76 Wh vs 96 Wh+26%
  2. SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
  3. GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 140 W+22%
  4. Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
  5. GPU compute (FP32)26.8 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS+16%
  6. GPU shader cores5,888 vs 7,424+26%
  7. RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
  8. Vapor chamber coolingNo · Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
  9. Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
  10. Thickness20 mm vs 17.8 mm+12%
  11. Brightness500 nits vs 550 nits+10%
  12. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 5070 Ti LaptopGeForce RTX 4080 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)115 W140 W
Video memory12 GB12 GB
Video memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
GPU shader cores5,8887,424
GPU compute (FP32)26.8 TFLOPS31.2 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light19,78319,370
Processor
ProcessorCore Ultra 9 275HXCore i7-12700H
CPU makerIntelIntel
CPU cores2414
CPU threads—20
Max CPU clock5.4 GHz4.7 GHz
Processor optionsCore Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HXCore i7-12700H, Core i7-13700H, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H, Core i9-13905H
Geekbench 6 multi-core—11,569
Geekbench 6 single-core—2,425
Cinebench 2024 multi-core—1,092
Display
Screen size16″16″
Resolution2560 × 16003200 × 2000
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)3K (1800p/2000p)
Refresh rate240 Hz120 Hz
Panel typeOLEDOLED
Brightness500 nits550 nits
sRGB coverage—100%
Response time1 ms1 ms
DCI-P3 coverage100%100%
Pixel density189 ppi236 ppi
Aspect ratio16:1016:10
G-Sync / FreeSyncYesNo
Advanced OptimusYesNo
MUX switchYesNo
HDRYesYes
TouchscreenNoYes
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)64 GB32 GB
RAM (base)16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5LPDDR5X
RAM speed6,400 MHz4,800 MHz
Max. supported RAM64 GB—
RAM slots2—
Upgradable RAMYesNo
SSD (up to)1,000 GB2,048 GB
SSD (base)1,000 GB512 GB
M.2 SSD slots21
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity76 Wh96 Wh
Power adapter230 W280 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesYes
Design & cooling
Weight2.3 kg2.4 kg
Thickness20 mm17.8 mm
Width357 mm355 mm
Depth276 mm251 mm
Body materialAluminium, PlasticAluminium
ColoursBlackBlack
Cooling fans22
Vapor chamber coolingNoYes
Liquid metal (CPU)YesNo
Fan noise (max. load)54 dB42 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 4Thunderbolt 4
Thunderbolt or USB4YesYes
USB-C ports22
USB-A ports31
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortNoNo
Ethernet portYesNo
SD card readerYesYes
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.35.2
Keyboard & camera
Keyboard backlightSingle-colour RGB—
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadYesNo
Key travel—1.4 mm
Webcam1,080p1,080p
IR camera (face login)YesYes
Fingerprint readerNoYes
Audio
Speakers2.02.4
Dolby AtmosNoYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare