- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (13) and where ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
8.8Score
Higher score 13 advantages≈ $2,450
vs
9.0Graphics9.0
9.7Overall performance9.2
9.6Display8.7
7.0Memory & storage3.0
2.2Battery & portability6.7
4.8Features & cooling8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 220 mm | +56 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 311 mm | +46 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 18 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.6 kg | +0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 73 Wh+4%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light19,783 vs 17,182+15%
- CPU cores24 vs 16+50%
- Advanced OptimusYes · ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026): No
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Upgradable RAMYes · ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Screen size16″ vs 14″+14%
- Max CPU clock5.4 GHz vs 4.9 GHz+10%
Why is ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.58 kg+46%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Thickness20 mm vs 18 mm+11%
- Cooling fans2 vs 3+50%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 8,533 MHz+33%
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 243 ppi+29%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 6+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.8 TFLOPS | 26.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 19,783 | 17,182 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 386H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 16 |
| CPU threads | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 386H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 16,499 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,763 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 1,230 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 243 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 8,533 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 73 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 250 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.58 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 18 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 311 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 220 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 55.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 6 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsRazer Blade 14 RTX 5060 (2025)8.89.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 (2025)8.89.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ RTX 5090 (2025)8.89.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5060 (2025)8.89.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2025)8.89.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsLenovo Legion 7i Gen 10 RTX 5070 (2025)8.89.1