Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Razer Blade 14 RTX 4060 (2024)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (19) and where Blade 14 RTX 4060 (2024) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Graphics6.5
9.6Overall performance7.0
9.6Display8.6
4.9Memory & storage7.6
2.2Battery & portability6.1
4.8Features & cooling7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)Blade 14 RTX 4060 (2024)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) | Blade 14 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 220 mm | +56 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 319.7 mm | +37.3 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 16.8 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.8 kg | +0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Blade 14 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- CPU cores20 vs 82.5×
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS+64%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,964 vs 9,644+55%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core19,015 vs 12,724+49%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,860 vs 9182×
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 68 Wh+12%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,072+50%
- Response time1 ms vs 3 ms3×
- Advanced OptimusYes · Blade 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
Why is Blade 14 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 96 GB3×
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 140 W+22%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.78 kg+29%
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Thickness20 mm vs 16.8 mm+19%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 1,024 GB+2%
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 96 GB+50%
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 216 ppi+14%
- Fan noise (max. load)54 dB vs 51.9 dB+4%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 1,024 GB+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 16 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,964 | 9,644 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 20 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,015 | 12,724 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,055 | 2,540 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,860 | 918 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 216 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,024 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 68 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.78 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 16.8 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 319.7 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 220 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | White, Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 51.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | USB4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | — | 1 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5070 (2025)8.28.7vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)8.28.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ Mercedes-AMG A3XW RTX 5070 (2025)8.28.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025)8.28.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5060 (2025)8.28.6vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5050 (2025)8.27.8