- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Stealth 16 AI Studio A1V RTX 4060 (2024)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) vs MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio A1V RTX 4060 (2024)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (18) and where Stealth 16 AI Studio A1V RTX 4060 (2024) wins (5) — every spec side by side.
8.3Score
Higher score 18 advantages≈ $3,000
vs
8.6Graphics5.5
9.6Overall performance6.9
9.6Display7.1
5.0Memory & storage3.4
2.2Battery & portability7.4
4.9Features & cooling7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)Stealth 16 AI Studio A1V RTX 4060 (2024)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) | Stealth 16 AI Studio A1V RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 260 mm | +16 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 356 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 20 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Stealth 16 AI Studio A1V RTX 4060 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS+90%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core19,015 vs 12,864+48%
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,964 vs 10,220+46%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,860 vs 969+92%
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 105 W+10%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,072+50%
- USB-A ports3 vs 13×
- CPU cores20 vs 16+25%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Stealth 16 AI Studio A1V RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Advanced OptimusYes · Stealth 16 AI Studio A1V RTX 4060 (2024): No
Why is Stealth 16 AI Studio A1V RTX 4060 (2024) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 100 Wh+31%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.99 kg+16%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 96 GB+50%
- CPU threads20 vs 22+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 105 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 13.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,964 | 10,220 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 7 155H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 22 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,015 | 12,864 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,055 | 2,489 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,860 | 969 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Response time | 1 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.99 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 20 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 356 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 260 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Blue |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 6 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5070 (2025)8.38.8vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5060 (2025)8.38.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)8.38.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ Mercedes-AMG A3XW RTX 5070 (2025)8.38.2
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 4060 (2024)vsMSI Stealth 16 AI Studio A1V RTX 4060 (2024)7.27.0
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Stealth 16 AI Studio A1V RTX 4060 (2024)7.37.0