- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (21) and where Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024) wins (7) — every spec side by side.
8.3Score
Higher score 21 advantages≈ $3,000
vs
8.6Graphics5.5
9.6Overall performance7.0
9.6Display6.0
5.0Memory & storage3.4
2.2Battery & portability3.6
4.9Features & cooling7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) | Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 235.3 mm | +40.7 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 355.7 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 19.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.9 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 60 Hz4×
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS+90%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,964 vs 9,751+53%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,860 vs 981+90%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core19,015 vs 13,643+39%
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 24 GB+33%
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 110 W+5%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,072+50%
- RAM (base)32 GB vs 8 GB4×
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 24 GB2.7×
- CPU cores20 vs 16+25%
Why is Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.9 kg+21%
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Brightness500 nits vs 600 nits+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
- CPU threads20 vs 22+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 110 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 13.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,964 | 9,751 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 22 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,015 | 13,643 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,055 | 2,402 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,860 | 981 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 600 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 24 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 24 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 1 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 75 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.9 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 19.9 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 355.7 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 235.3 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.4 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5070 (2025)8.38.8vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5060 (2025)8.38.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)8.38.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ Mercedes-AMG A3XW RTX 5070 (2025)8.38.2
vs
Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024)vsDell XPS 16 9640 RTX 4070 (2024)6.36.6vs
Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4070 (2024)6.36.3