- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) vs ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (15) and where ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (8) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) | ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 243 mm | +33 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 355 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 19 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.1 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) better than ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,860 vs 7352.5×
- Panel typeOLED vs Mini-LED
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 20 TFLOPS+31%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core19,015 vs 15,180+25%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,964 vs 12,860+16%
- Response time1 ms vs 3 ms3×
- CPU cores20 vs 14+43%
- Advanced OptimusYes · ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
Why is ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 120 W+4%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 2.1 kg+10%
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Thickness20 mm vs 19 mm+5%
- Cooling fans2 vs 3+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)54 dB vs 50.2 dB+8%
- Max CPU clock5.2 GHz vs 5.4 GHz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 120 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 20 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,964 | 12,860 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core i9-13900H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core i9-13900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,015 | 15,180 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,055 | 2,693 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,860 | 735 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 97% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.1 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 19 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 243 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 50.2 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.0 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5070 (2025)8.38.8
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5060 (2025)8.38.4
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)8.38.5
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ Mercedes-AMG A3XW RTX 5070 (2025)8.38.2
vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAlienware X16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.1
vs
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen Transcend 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.98.3
