- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) vs ProArt PX13 HN7306 RTX 4070 (2024)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 RTX 4070 (2024)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (17) and where ProArt PX13 HN7306 RTX 4070 (2024) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
8.2Score
Higher score 17 advantages≈ $3,000
vs
8.6Graphics5.3
9.6Overall performance7.6
9.6Display7.6
4.9Memory & storage8.6
2.2Battery & portability8.0
4.8Features & cooling6.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)ProArt PX13 HN7306 RTX 4070 (2024)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) | ProArt PX13 HN7306 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 209.9 mm | +66.1 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 298.2 mm | +58.8 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 17.7 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.4 kg | +0.9 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025) better than ProArt PX13 HN7306 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 60 Hz4×
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 75 W+53%
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 14.3 TFLOPS+83%
- CPU cores20 vs 102×
- MUX switchYes · ProArt PX13 HN7306 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,964 vs 10,211+47%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core19,015 vs 13,987+36%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,860 vs 1,093+70%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 73 Wh+4%
- USB-A ports3 vs 13×
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · ProArt PX13 HN7306 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- Advanced OptimusYes · ProArt PX13 HN7306 RTX 4070 (2024): No
Why is ProArt PX13 HN7306 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.38 kg+67%
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Thickness20 mm vs 17.7 mm+13%
- Pixel density189 ppi vs 255 ppi+35%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 8,000 MHz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 75 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 14.3 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,964 | 10,211 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 20 | 10 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen AI 9 365, Ryzen AI Max+ 388, Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,015 | 13,987 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,055 | 3,031 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,860 | 1,093 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 13.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 255 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | No |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 8,000 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 73 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.38 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 17.7 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 298.2 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 209.9 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 53.3 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | USB4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 1 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5070 (2025)8.28.7vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 7 16 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)8.28.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ Mercedes-AMG A3XW RTX 5070 (2025)8.28.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025)8.28.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5060 (2025)8.28.6vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5050 (2025)8.27.8