- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) vs ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) does better (3) and where ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display9.5
2.8Memory & storage5.2
2.2Battery & portability9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) | ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 246 mm | +30 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 354 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 17 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- CPU cores24 vs 16+50%
- Video memory16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 5,888+30%
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.95 kg+18%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Thickness20 mm vs 17 mm+18%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 115 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 26.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 20,115 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core Ultra 9 285H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 9 285H |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | — | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | — | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | — | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | — | 7,467 MHz |
| Upgradable RAM | — | No |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.95 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 17 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 246 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | — | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 68 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | — | 2 |
| USB-A ports | — | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | No |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)5.05.3
vs
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)5.25.3
vs
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)4.95.3
vs
MSI Prestige 14 AI Studio RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)5.35.3
vs
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7i 14 9 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)5.55.3
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.89.4
