pan.tf
Compare
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) vs ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)

What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) does better (7) and where ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Acer · 2025Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)

5.3Score

7 advantages≈ $4,100

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)

Asus · 2025ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)

8.9Score

6 advantages≈ $4,400

Higher score

9.8Display8.8

2.8Memory & storage3.4

2.2Battery & portability7.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)

	Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)	ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)	Difference
Depth	276 mm	220 mm	+56 mm
Width	357 mm	311 mm	+46 mm
Thickness	20 mm	18 mm	+2 mm
Weight	2.3 kg	1.6 kg	+0.7 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) better than ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?

Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
CPU cores24 vs 122×
Battery capacity76 Wh vs 73 Wh+4%
Video memory16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
GPU shader cores7,680 vs 5,888+30%
Screen size16″ vs 14″+14%
Max CPU clock5.5 GHz vs 5.1 GHz+8%

Why is ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)?

Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
Weight2.3 kg vs 1.57 kg+46%
SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
Thickness20 mm vs 18 mm+11%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)≈ $4,1005.3	Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)≈ $4,4008.9
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop	GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	—	110 W
Video memory	16 GB	12 GB
Video memory type	GDDR7	GDDR7
GPU shader cores	7,680	5,888
GPU compute (FP32)	—	25.9 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	—	18,437
Processor
Processor	Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus	Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
CPU maker	Intel	AMD
CPU cores	24	12
CPU threads	—	24
Max CPU clock	5.5 GHz	5.1 GHz
Processor options	—	Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 270
Geekbench 6 multi-core	—	16,330
Geekbench 6 single-core	—	3,035
Cinebench 2024 multi-core	—	1,261
Display
Screen size	16″	14″
Resolution	2560 × 1600	2880 × 1800
Resolution class	QHD (1440p/1600p)	3K (1800p/2000p)
Refresh rate	240 Hz	120 Hz
Panel type	OLED	OLED
Brightness	—	500 nits
sRGB coverage	—	100%
Response time	—	1 ms
DCI-P3 coverage	—	100%
Pixel density	—	243 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:10
G-Sync / FreeSync	—	Yes
Advanced Optimus	—	No
MUX switch	—	Yes
HDR	—	Yes
Touchscreen	—	No
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	32 GB	32 GB
RAM (base)	32 GB	32 GB
RAM type	—	LPDDR5
RAM speed	—	8,000 MHz
Upgradable RAM	—	No
SSD (up to)	1,000 GB	2,000 GB
SSD (base)	1,000 GB	2,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots	—	1
SSD interface	—	PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity	76 Wh	73 Wh
Power adapter	230 W	200 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	—	Yes
Design & cooling
Weight	2.3 kg	1.57 kg
Thickness	20 mm	18 mm
Width	357 mm	311 mm
Depth	276 mm	220 mm
Body material	—	Aluminium
Colours	Black	White
Cooling fans	—	3
Vapor chamber cooling	—	No
Liquid metal (CPU)	—	Yes
Fan noise (max. load)	—	54.4 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4	Thunderbolt 4	USB4
Thunderbolt or USB4	Yes	Yes
USB-C ports	—	2
USB-A ports	—	2
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	—	No
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	—	Yes
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	—	Yes
Numeric keypad	—	No
Key travel	—	1.7 mm
Webcam	—	1,080p
IR camera (face login)	—	Yes
Fingerprint reader	—	No
Audio
Speakers	—	4 speakers
Dolby Atmos	—	Yes