Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 4060 (2024)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (19) and where LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 4060 (2024) wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Graphics5.9
6.1Overall performance5.0
7.6Display5.6
8.6Memory & storage9.3
4.4Battery & portability5.8
7.7Features & cooling5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 4060 (2024)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024) | LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 258.7 mm | +21.2 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 359.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 28.6 mm | 23.9 mm | +4.7 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.4 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024) better than LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 60 Wh+50%
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 115 W+22%
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Brightness500 nits vs 300 nits+67%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core908 vs 593+53%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core10,527 vs 9,463+11%
- CPU cores10 vs 8+25%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
Why is LOQ 15IRX9 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB2×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light9,218 vs 10,313+12%
- Weight2.6 kg vs 2.38 kg+9%
- GPU compute (FP32)13.4 TFLOPS vs 14.6 TFLOPS+9%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Advanced OptimusNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024): Yes
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,072+20%
- Thickness28.6 mm vs 23.9 mm+20%
- Fan noise (max. load)55.8 dB vs 48 dB+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.4 TFLOPS | 14.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 9,218 | 10,313 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-14450HX | Core i5-12450H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-14450HX, Core i5-14500HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core i7-14700HX, Core i9-14900HX | Core i5-12450H, Core i5-13450HX, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-14700HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,527 | 9,463 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,346 | 2,209 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 908 | 593 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | — | 32 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 74% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 8,192 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.38 kg |
| Thickness | 28.6 mm | 23.9 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 359.9 mm |
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 258.7 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 55.8 dB | 48 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)6.27.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)7.47.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)7.47.6vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAlienware m16 R2 RTX 4060 (2024)7.47.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)vsLenovo Legion Slim 5 Gen 9 16 RTX 4050 (2024)7.47.3
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)7.67.4