Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Lenovo Legion 5i Gen 9 RTX 4050 (2024)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (11) and where Legion 5i Gen 9 RTX 4050 (2024) wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Graphics5.0
6.1Overall performance5.9
7.6Display8.1
8.6Memory & storage8.6
4.4Battery & portability6.9
7.7Features & cooling6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)Legion 5i Gen 9 RTX 4050 (2024)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024) | Legion 5i Gen 9 RTX 4050 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 262.3 mm | +17.6 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 359.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 28.6 mm | 25.2 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Legion 5i Gen 9 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Legion 5i Gen 9 RTX 4050 (2024): No
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 80 Wh+12%
- Brightness500 nits vs 300 nits+67%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light9,218 vs 8,538+8%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Legion 5i Gen 9 RTX 4050 (2024): No
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core908 vs 790+15%
- Key travel1.8 mm vs 1.5 mm+20%
- Fan noise (max. load)55.8 dB vs 58.3 dB+4%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+4%
Why is Legion 5i Gen 9 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Weight2.6 kg vs 2.3 kg+13%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core10,527 vs 11,260+7%
- Advanced OptimusNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024): Yes
- HDRNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024): Yes
- Thickness28.6 mm vs 25.2 mm+13%
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 189 ppi+33%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,346 vs 2,411+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.4 TFLOPS | 13.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 9,218 | 8,538 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-14450HX | Core i5-13450HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 10 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-14450HX, Core i5-14500HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core i7-14700HX, Core i9-14900HX | Core i5-13450HX, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core i7-14700HX, Core i9-14900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,527 | 11,260 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,346 | 2,411 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 908 | 790 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 73% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 28.6 mm | 25.2 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 359.7 mm |
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 262.3 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 55.8 dB | 58.3 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)6.27.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)7.47.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)7.47.6vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAlienware m16 R2 RTX 4060 (2024)7.47.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)vsLenovo Legion Slim 5 Gen 9 16 RTX 4050 (2024)7.47.3
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)7.67.4