Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023) vs HP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023) does better (12) and where Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Graphics8.7
7.7Overall performance7.6
7.6Display5.6
4.9Memory & storage3.6
3.4Battery & portability7.7
6.2Features & cooling5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023)Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023) | Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 259 mm | +20.9 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 369 mm | −8.9 mm |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 24 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.4 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 83 Wh+8%
- CPU cores14 vs 8+75%
- Brightness400 nits vs 250 nits+60%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light13,600 vs 13,065+4%
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Response time4 ms vs 7 ms+75%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 137 ppi+4%
- Max CPU clock4.7 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+2%
Why is Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 145 W+4%
- Weight2.8 kg vs 2.36 kg+19%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Advanced OptimusNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Thickness28.2 mm vs 24 mm+18%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+17%
- Fan noise (max. load)62.7 dB vs 58.3 dB+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 145 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 21.8 TFLOPS | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,600 | 13,065 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-13500HX | Core i7-13700HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX | Core i5-13420H, Core i5-13500H, Ryzen 5 7640HS, Core i7-13620H, Core i7-13700HX, Ryzen 7 7840HS, Core i9-13900HX, Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,540 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,522 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 970 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16.1″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 4 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 80% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 137 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.36 kg |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 369 mm |
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 62.7 dB | 58.3 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aero 16 OLED BSF RTX 4070 (2023)7.67.7vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming F15 TUF507 RTX 4070 (2023)7.67.7vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 RTX 4070 (2023)7.67.6
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.65.3vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2024)7.66.7vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)7.67.5