- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) vs Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) vs MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) does better (4) and where Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Graphics8.8
6.4Overall performance8.5
7.6Display8.0
2.8Memory & storage3.6
3.5Battery & portability3.6
4.2Features & cooling8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) | Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 280 mm | 284 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 357 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 29 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.7 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) better than Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Thickness28 mm vs 29 mm+4%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
Why is Vector 16 HX AI A2XW RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)16 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS+95%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,929 vs 19,432+78%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 240 Hz+45%
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 5,888+92%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- CPU cores16 vs 24+50%
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 96 GB3×
- Weight2.8 kg vs 2.7 kg+4%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 6,400 MHz+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 16 TFLOPS | 31.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,929 | 19,432 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13700HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 16 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 4 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 80% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.7 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 29 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 280 mm | 284 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 62.7 dB | 49 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)8.26.2vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4060 (2024)6.28.0
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)7.36.2vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4070 (2024)6.28.4vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)6.27.4vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)6.26.2