- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) vs Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 3050 (2023)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) vs Lenovo Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 3050 (2023)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) does better (15) and where Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 3050 (2023) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Graphics3.1
6.4Overall performance3.6
7.6Display8.5
2.8Memory & storage5.4
3.5Battery & portability9.3
4.2Features & cooling6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 3050 (2023)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) | Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 3050 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 280 mm | 249.1 mm | +30.9 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 327.5 mm | +32.5 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 20.8 mm | +7.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 1.8 kg | +1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) better than Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 3050 (2023)?
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,929 vs 4,8562.3×
- GPU compute (FP32)16 TFLOPS vs 7.9 TFLOPS2×
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 95 W+47%
- CPU cores16 vs 62.7×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 74 Wh+22%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 2,048+50%
- Video memory8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 3050 (2023): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 3050 (2023): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 3050 (2023): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
Why is Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 14 RTX 3050 (2023) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Weight2.8 kg vs 1.75 kg+60%
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Response time4 ms vs 1 ms4×
- Thickness28 mm vs 20.8 mm+35%
- HDRNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 234 ppi+65%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 6,400 MHz+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 95 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 2,048 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 16 TFLOPS | 7.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,929 | 4,856 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen 5 7640HS |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | 6 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 5 7640HS, Ryzen 7 7840HS, Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 10,009 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,425 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 736 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14.5″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 4 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 80% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 234 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 74 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 170 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 1.75 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 20.8 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 327.5 mm |
| Depth | 280 mm | 249.1 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 62.7 dB | 52.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)8.26.2
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4060 (2024)6.28.0
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)6.26.2
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)6.27.4
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4070 (2024)6.28.4
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.1

