- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) vs ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) vs Asus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) does better (6) and where ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Graphics8.9
6.4Overall performance8.4
7.6Display7.4
2.8Memory & storage3.2
3.5Battery & portability4.8
4.2Features & cooling7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) | ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 280 mm | 264 mm | +16 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 354 mm | +6 mm |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 30 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.5 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023) better than ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SD card readerYes · ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Thickness28 mm vs 30 mm+7%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 138 ppi+3%
Why is ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)16 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS+95%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,929 vs 20,938+92%
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 5,888+92%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Weight2.8 kg vs 2.5 kg+12%
- Ethernet1 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s5×
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023): Yes
- Cooling fans2 vs 3+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)62.7 dB vs 44 dB+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 16 TFLOPS | 31.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,929 | 20,938 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX | Core i9-14900HX, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Ryzen 9 9955HX |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 4 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 80% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 138 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Thickness | 28 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 360 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 280 mm | 264 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 62.7 dB | 44 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.8 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)8.26.2
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)6.26.2vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4070 (2024)6.28.4vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)7.36.2vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4050 (2024)6.27.4vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72 RTX 4060 (2024)6.28.0