Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026) vs Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026) does better (9) and where Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5070 Ti (2026) wins (20) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Graphics8.9
7.7Overall performance9.1
7.9Display9.5
8.6Memory & storage8.6
7.2Battery & portability9.4
9.2Features & cooling9.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026)Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026) | Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5070 Ti (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 255.3 mm | +20.2 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 357.2 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 24.5 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026) better than Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5070 Ti (2026)?
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 165 Hz+9%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light22,532 vs 20,829+8%
- Video memory16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 5,888+30%
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5070 Ti (2026): No
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Key travel2 mm vs 1.7 mm+18%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%
Why is Aorus Master 16 AM6J RTX 5070 Ti (2026) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026)?
- Geekbench 6 multi-core10,575 vs 16,188+53%
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 140 W+22%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core882 vs 1,706+93%
- Battery capacity92 Wh vs 99 Wh+8%
- CPU cores10 vs 16+60%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.3 kg+9%
- GPU compute (FP32)30 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS+4%
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- CPU threads16 vs 322×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 30 TFLOPS | 31.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 22,532 | 20,829 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 10 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-14450HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core i9-14900HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Ryzen 9 9955HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,575 | 16,188 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,318 | 2,874 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 882 | 1,706 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 92 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 24.5 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 357.2 mm |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 255.3 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 60 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | USB4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 2 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026)9.09.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026)vsMSI Raider 16 HX B2W RTX 5080 (2026)9.09.3vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)9.08.9
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026)9.39.0vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026)9.39.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026)vsMSI Crosshair 16 Max HX RTX 5060 (2026)9.09.1