Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025) vs Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025) does better (13) and where Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Graphics8.9
9.3Overall performance9.0
7.8Display9.6
8.7Memory & storage6.7
4.9Battery & portability5.7
8.5Features & cooling9.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025) | Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 276 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 364 mm | −7.2 mm |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 27 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.7 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025) better than Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- GPU power (TGP)165 W vs 140 W+18%
- GPU compute (FP32)40 TFLOPS vs 31.2 TFLOPS+28%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light24,399 vs 21,669+13%
- Weight2.66 kg vs 2.72 kg+2%
- Video memory16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 5,888+30%
- CPU cores20 vs 16+25%
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- SD card readerYes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- IR camera (face login)Yes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- Key travel2 mm vs 1.5 mm+33%
Why is Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)?
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 240 Hz+33%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- Advanced OptimusNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025): Yes
- HDRNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025): Yes
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
- Cooling fans2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 165 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 40 TFLOPS | 31.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 24,399 | 21,669 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 18,758 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,042 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,855 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 400 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.66 kg | 2.72 kg |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 27 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 364 mm |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 276 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 53.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 2 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)vsXMG Core 16 RTX 5070 (2025)9.39.3vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026)9.39.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026)9.38.5vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)9.37.3