Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026) vs HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026) does better (9) and where Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026) wins (21) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Graphics9.5
7.6Overall performance9.2
7.9Display9.4
8.6Memory & storage4.4
7.2Battery & portability2.8
9.2Features & cooling9.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026) | Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 269 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 357 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 26 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 3 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026) better than Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Battery capacity92 Wh vs 83 Wh+11%
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.97 kg+19%
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 165 Hz+9%
- SD card readerYes · Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026): No
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 1,000 GB+2%
Why is Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)?
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 175 W+52%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core10,575 vs 17,190+63%
- GPU compute (FP32)26.8 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS+57%
- CPU cores10 vs 202×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core882 vs 1,752+99%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light20,865 vs 26,719+28%
- Response time3 ms vs 0.2 ms15×
- Video memory12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 7,680+30%
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.8 TFLOPS | 42 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 20,865 | 26,719 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-14450HX | Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 20 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-14450HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core i9-14900HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Ryzen AI 7 450, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,575 | 17,190 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,318 | 3,178 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 882 | 1,752 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 0.2 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 92 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.97 kg |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 61.8 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 2 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsMSI Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5080 (2026)8.99.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)8.98.9
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)9.18.9vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsMSI Crosshair 16 HX E14W RTX 5060 (2026)8.98.8vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsMSI Crosshair 16 HX AI RTX 5060 (2026)8.98.8
vs
HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)9.09.2