Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026) vs Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5060 (2026)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026) does better (9) and where ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5060 (2026) wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Graphics7.1
7.5Overall performance9.0
7.9Display9.4
8.6Memory & storage8.6
7.2Battery & portability3.8
9.2Features & cooling9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026)ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5060 (2026)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026) | ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5060 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 268 mm | +7.5 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 354 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 30.8 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.6 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026) better than ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5060 (2026)?
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS+42%
- Battery capacity92 Wh vs 90 Wh+2%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light15,668 vs 13,680+15%
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.65 kg+6%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,328+38%
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5060 (2026): No
- SD card readerYes · ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5060 (2026): No
- Thickness26.8 mm vs 30.8 mm+15%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%
Why is ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5060 (2026) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026)?
- Geekbench 6 multi-core10,575 vs 22,7302.1×
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core882 vs 2,5762.9×
- CPU cores10 vs 242.4×
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 300 Hz+67%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- HDRNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026): Yes
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
- CPU threads16 vs 24+50%
- Cooling fans2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 18.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 15,668 | 13,680 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-14450HX | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-14450HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core i9-14900HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,575 | 22,730 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,318 | 3,439 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 882 | 2,576 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 92 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 380 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.65 kg |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 30.8 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 268 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Gray, Green |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 2 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2026)8.78.4
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026)vsMSI Crosshair 16 Max HX E2 RTX 5070 (2026)8.78.3
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026)vsMSI Raider 16 Max HX B2 RTX 5080 (2026)8.79.1
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026)8.79.0
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)8.78.9
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026)9.38.7

