NewMSI Katana 15 HX C14W RTX 5060 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5070 (2025) vs MSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)

What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (7) and where Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5070 (2025)
8.6Score
7 advantages≈ $2,900
Higher score
vs
MSI Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)
7.0Score
2 advantages≈ $3,100
8.7Display9.7
4.6Memory & storage2.4
6.5Battery & portability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5070 (2025)Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)
357 × 27624359 × 26628
Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5070 (2025)Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)Difference
Depth276 mm266 mm+10 mm
Width357 mm359 mm−2 mm
Thickness24 mm28 mm−4 mm
Weight2.7 kg2.5 kg+0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025)?

  1. RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
  2. CPU cores24 vs 83×
  3. Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025): No
  4. RAM (base)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
  5. Thickness24 mm vs 28 mm+17%
  6. RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%
  7. Max CPU clock5.4 GHz vs 5 GHz+8%

Why is Pulse A16 AI+ C3 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5070 (2025)?

  1. Panel typeIPS vs OLED
  2. Weight2.7 kg vs 2.5 kg+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 5070 LaptopGeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)140 W—
Video memory8 GB8 GB
Video memory typeGDDR7GDDR7
GPU shader cores4,6084,608
GPU compute (FP32)31.3 TFLOPS—
3DMark Steel Nomad Light15,035—
Processor
ProcessorCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen AI 7 350
CPU makerIntelAMD
CPU cores248
Max CPU clock5.4 GHz5 GHz
Processor optionsCore Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX—
Display
Screen size16″—
Resolution2560 × 16002560 × 1600
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)QHD (1440p/1600p)
Refresh rate240 Hz240 Hz
Panel typeIPSOLED
Brightness400 nits—
sRGB coverage100%—
Response time3 ms—
Pixel density142 ppi—
Aspect ratio16:1016:9
G-Sync / FreeSyncYes—
Advanced OptimusNo—
MUX switchYes—
HDRNo—
TouchscreenNo—
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)32 GB16 GB
RAM (base)32 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5DDR5
RAM speed6,400 MHz5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM64 GB—
RAM slots2—
Upgradable RAMYes—
SSD (up to)1,000 GB1,000 GB
SSD (base)1,000 GB1,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots2—
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4—
Battery & power
Battery capacity90 Wh90 Wh
Power adapter330 W200 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)Yes—
USB-C charging power100 W—
Design & cooling
Weight2.7 kg2.5 kg
Thickness24 mm28 mm
Width357 mm359 mm
Depth276 mm266 mm
Body materialAluminium—
ColoursBlackBlack
Cooling fans2—
Vapor chamber coolingNo—
Liquid metal (CPU)Yes—
Fan noise (max. load)54 dB—
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4Thunderbolt 4—
Thunderbolt or USB4YesNo
USB-C ports2—
USB-A ports3—
HDMIHDMI 2.1—
HDMI 2.1Yes—
(Mini) DisplayPortNo—
Ethernet5 Gbit/s—
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerYes—
3.5 mm audio jackYes—
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.3
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboardYes—
Numeric keypadYes—
Key travel2 mm—
Webcam1,080p—
IR camera (face login)Yes—
Fingerprint readerNo—
Audio
Speakers2.02 speakers
Dolby AtmosNo—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare