Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026) vs HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026) does better (9) and where Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) wins (21) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Graphics9.2
7.1Overall performance9.1
7.9Display9.4
8.6Memory & storage4.4
7.2Battery & portability2.8
9.2Features & cooling9.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026)Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026) | Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 269 mm | +6.5 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 357 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 26 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 3 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026) better than Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Battery capacity92 Wh vs 83 Wh+11%
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.97 kg+19%
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 165 Hz+9%
- SD card readerYes · Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026): No
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 1,000 GB+2%
Why is Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026)?
- GPU compute (FP32)18.4 TFLOPS vs 37.4 TFLOPS2×
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 175 W+52%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core10,575 vs 17,190+63%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light13,644 vs 21,794+60%
- CPU cores10 vs 202×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core882 vs 1,752+99%
- GPU shader cores3,328 vs 5,888+77%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Response time3 ms vs 0.2 ms15×
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 18.4 TFLOPS | 37.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,644 | 21,794 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-14450HX | Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 20 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-14450HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core i9-14900HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Ryzen AI 7 450, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,575 | 17,190 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,318 | 3,178 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 882 | 1,752 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 0.2 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 92 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.97 kg |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 61.8 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 2 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2026)8.58.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2026)8.58.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026)vsMSI Crosshair 16 Max HX E2 RTX 5070 (2026)8.58.3vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026)vsMSI Crosshair A16 HX E8W RTX 5070 (2026)8.58.1
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026)9.38.5vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026)9.38.5