Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Lenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (19) and where LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (8) — every spec side by side.
7.6Score
Higher score 19 advantages≈ $2,100
vs
4.8Graphics8.5
7.4Overall performance8.2
9.3Display5.5
4.4Memory & storage3.6
6.5Battery & portability5.0
7.8Features & cooling5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025)LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025) | LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 259 mm | +17 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 360 mm | −3 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 24 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.4 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025) better than LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 60 Wh+50%
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Response time3 ms vs 20 ms6.7×
- Ethernet5 Gbit/s vs 1 Gbit/s5×
- CPU cores20 vs 14+43%
- Brightness400 nits vs 300 nits+33%
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
Why is LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)9.7 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS2.7×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,911 vs 14,887+67%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Weight2.7 kg vs 2.4 kg+13%
- GPU shader cores3,328 vs 4,608+38%
- Advanced OptimusNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
- Fan noise (max. load)54 dB vs 50.8 dB+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 9.7 TFLOPS | 26.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,911 | 14,887 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core i7-13650HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core i5-13450HX, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i7-14700HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 18,758 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,042 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,855 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 20 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 69% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 170 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.4 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 360 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Silver |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 50.8 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 2 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025)vsXMG Pro 16 RTX 5060 (2025)7.67.8vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)7.67.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5060 (2025)7.67.8vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.67.3
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)7.17.3vsLenovo LOQ 15 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.37.3