Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026) vs Lenovo LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026) does better (19) and where LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026) wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Graphics6.6
5.2Overall performance6.1
7.9Display6.9
8.6Memory & storage2.8
7.2Battery & portability8.0
9.2Features & cooling7.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026) | LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 255 mm | +20.5 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 345 mm | +11.8 mm |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 23 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.1 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026) better than LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 16 GB4×
- Battery capacity92 Wh vs 60 Wh+53%
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Response time3 ms vs 9 ms3×
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 165 Hz+9%
- Brightness400 nits vs 300 nits+33%
- CPU cores10 vs 8+25%
- CPU threads16 vs 82×
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026): No
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
Why is LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)?
- GPU compute (FP32)7.7 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS2.4×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light7,059 vs 11,736+66%
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.1 kg+19%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core10,575 vs 11,489+9%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,328+30%
- Thickness26.8 mm vs 23 mm+17%
- Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,318 vs 2,757+19%
- Max CPU clock4.8 GHz vs 5.1 GHz+6%
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 148 ppi+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 7.7 TFLOPS | 18.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,059 | 11,736 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-14450HX | Core Ultra 7 355 |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-14450HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, Core i9-14900HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core i5-13450HX, Core i7-13645HX, Ryzen 7 250, Core Ultra 7 355 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,575 | 11,489 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,318 | 2,757 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 882 | 760 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 9 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 79% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 148 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | Yes |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 92 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 245 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.1 kg |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 345 mm |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 255 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 50 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Zone RGB |
| Per-key RGB | — | No |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 2 mm | 1.6 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)vsHP Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026)7.26.8vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5080 (2026)7.27.2vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5090 (2026)7.27.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)vsHP Omen 15 RTX 5070 (2026)7.27.2
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)9.37.2vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)9.37.2