Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024) vs HP Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024)
What Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024) does better (14) and where Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.9Graphics7.6
5.7Overall performance6.9
6.4Display3.8
4.3Memory & storage2.6
9.4Battery & portability8.0
8.7Features & cooling6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024)Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024)
| Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024) | Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 255.3 mm | 259 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Width | 324.1 mm | 369 mm | −44.9 mm |
| Thickness | 20.9 mm | 23 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 2.3 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- Brightness500 nits vs 300 nits+67%
- Weight1.9 kg vs 2.33 kg+23%
- CPU cores14 vs 10+40%
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024): No
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
- Thickness20.9 mm vs 23 mm+10%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- sRGB coverage100% vs 62%+61%
Why is Victus 16 RTX 4070 (2024) better than Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- Video memory8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- GPU compute (FP32)14.6 TFLOPS vs 20 TFLOPS+37%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 83 Wh+9%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light10,244 vs 12,750+24%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- GPU shader cores3,072 vs 4,608+50%
- Upgradable RAMNo · Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024): Yes
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
- Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
- Screen size14.5″ vs 16.1″+11%
- Fan noise (max. load)52 dB vs 48 dB+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 120 W | 120 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,072 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 14.6 TFLOPS | 20 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 10,244 | 12,750 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 5 125H | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | 10 |
| CPU threads | 18 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 5 125H, Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H | Core i5-14450HX, Core i5-14500HX, Ryzen 5 8645HS, Core i7-14700HX, Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,237 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,181 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 712 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14.5″ | 16.1″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 62% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 41% |
| Pixel density | 156 ppi | 137 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 2.33 kg |
| Thickness | 20.9 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 324.1 mm | 369 mm |
| Depth | 255.3 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52 dB | 48 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)7.36.2vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2024)7.37.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A15 FA507 RTX 4070 (2024)7.37.6vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAlienware m16 R2 RTX 4060 (2024)7.37.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024)vsLenovo Legion Slim 5 Gen 9 16 RTX 4050 (2024)7.37.3vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023)7.37.6