Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024) vs MSI Katana A17 AI RTX 4070 (2024)
What Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (19) and where Katana A17 AI RTX 4070 (2024) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Graphics7.0
4.6Overall performance7.6
6.4Display2.7
4.5Memory & storage7.5
9.4Battery & portability2.1
8.7Features & cooling4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024)Katana A17 AI RTX 4070 (2024)
| Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024) | Katana A17 AI RTX 4070 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 255.3 mm | 273 mm | −17.7 mm |
| Width | 324.1 mm | 398 mm | −73.9 mm |
| Thickness | 20.9 mm | 25.2 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 2.7 kg | −0.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Katana A17 AI RTX 4070 (2024)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 54 Wh+42%
- Brightness500 nits vs 250 nits2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Katana A17 AI RTX 4070 (2024): No
- Weight1.9 kg vs 2.7 kg+42%
- CPU cores14 vs 8+75%
- Response time7 ms vs 26 ms3.7×
- Thickness20.9 mm vs 25.2 mm+21%
- Advanced OptimusYes · Katana A17 AI RTX 4070 (2024): No
- RAM typeLPDDR5X vs DDR5
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)Yes · Katana A17 AI RTX 4070 (2024): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Katana A17 AI RTX 4070 (2024): No
- USB-C ports2 vs 12×
Why is Katana A17 AI RTX 4070 (2024) better than Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- GPU compute (FP32)8.2 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS2.2×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light6,112 vs 12,9222.1×
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core10,237 vs 13,581+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core712 vs 968+36%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Upgradable RAMNo · Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024): Yes
- M.2 SSD slots1 vs 22×
- USB-A ports2 vs 3+50%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,181 vs 2,703+24%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 105 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 8.2 TFLOPS | 18.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 6,112 | 12,922 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 5 125H | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 18 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 5 125H, Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H | Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,237 | 13,581 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,181 | 2,703 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 712 | 968 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14.5″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 59% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 26 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 40% |
| Pixel density | 156 ppi | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 7,467 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | No | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 54 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.9 kg | 2.7 kg |
| Thickness | 20.9 mm | 25.2 mm |
| Width | 324.1 mm | 398 mm |
| Depth | 255.3 mm | 273 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 52 dB | 59.8 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA607 RTX 4050 (2024)6.26.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Sword 16 HX B14V RTX 4060 (2024)6.25.9vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Victus 16 RTX 4060 (2024)6.26.6vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4060 (2023)6.26.2vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024)vsGigabyte G6 RTX 4050 (2024)6.26.2vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4070 (2023)6.27.7