Acer Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026) vs Acer Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)
What Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026) does better (15) and where Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023) wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Graphics9.6
9.0Overall performance9.5
9.5Display9.8
9.6Memory & storage8.6
6.6Battery & portability7.9
6.9Features & cooling9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026)Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)
| Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026) | Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 307.9 mm | 280 mm | +27.9 mm |
| Width | 401 mm | 380.4 mm | +20.6 mm |
| Thickness | 29.6 mm | 21.9 mm | +7.7 mm |
| Weight | 3.5 kg | 3 kg | +0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026) better than Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)192 GB vs 64 GB3×
- SSD (up to)8,192 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core23,284 vs 17,604+32%
- Max. supported RAM192 GB vs 64 GB3×
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core2,608 vs 1,809+44%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light25,580 vs 24,735+3%
- Advanced OptimusYes · Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023): No
- IR camera (face login)Yes · Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023): No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- M.2 SSD slots3 vs 2+50%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%
Why is Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023) better than Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026)?
- Weight3.5 kg vs 3 kg+17%
- GPU compute (FP32)42 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS+8%
- Thickness29.6 mm vs 21.9 mm+35%
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 9,728+27%
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026): Yes
- Cooling fans2 vs 3+50%
- CPU threads24 vs 32+33%
- Pixel density168 ppi vs 178 ppi+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 9,728 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 42 TFLOPS | 45.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 25,580 | 24,735 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core i9-13900HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 24 | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core i9-13900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 23,284 | 17,604 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,411 | 3,036 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 2,608 | 1,809 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 17″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 250 Hz | 250 Hz |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 168 ppi | 178 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 192 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 192 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 4 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 8,192 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 3 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 100 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 400 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 140 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3.5 kg | 3 kg |
| Thickness | 29.6 mm | 21.9 mm |
| Width | 401 mm | 380.4 mm |
| Depth | 307.9 mm | 280 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 50.3 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 5 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.8 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 6.0 | 2.4 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026)vsMSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5090 (2026)9.59.2vs
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026)vsRazer Blade 18 RTX 5090 (2026)9.59.0vs
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026)vsAcer Predator Helios 18 AI PH18-I71 RTX 5090 (2026)9.59.4
vsAcer Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026)9.79.5vs
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026)vsMSI Titan 18 HX AI RTX 5080 (2026)9.59.3vsAcer Predator Helios 18 AI RTX 5080 (2026)vsMSI Titan 18 HX AI RTX 5090 (2026)9.59.6