- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) vs TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition RX 7700S (2023)
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition RX 7700S (2023)
What Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (24) and where TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition RX 7700S (2023) wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Graphics6.0
7.5Overall performance5.8
8.3Display6.3
4.9Memory & storage6.3
4.3Battery & portability8.7
9.0Features & cooling4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition RX 7700S (2023)
| Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) | TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition RX 7700S (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 295.5 mm | 252 mm | +43.5 mm |
| Width | 399.3 mm | 355 mm | +44.3 mm |
| Thickness | 27.6 mm | 26.8 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition RX 7700S (2023)?
- CPU cores16 vs 82×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition RX 7700S (2023): No
- Geekbench 6 multi-core14,967 vs 10,262+46%
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 120 W+17%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,378 vs 752+83%
- Brightness500 nits vs 300 nits+67%
- Response time8 ms vs 25 ms3.1×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 2,048+25%
- Advanced OptimusYes · TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition RX 7700S (2023): No
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition RX 7700S (2023): No
Why is TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition RX 7700S (2023) better than Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)13.4 TFLOPS vs 20.3 TFLOPS+51%
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- Weight2.7 kg vs 2.2 kg+23%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light9,368 vs 9,782+4%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- Thickness27.6 mm vs 26.8 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | Radeon RX 7700S |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | AMD |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 120 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,048 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.4 TFLOPS | 20.3 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 9,368 | 9,782 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 24 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 14,967 | 10,262 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,753 | 2,206 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,378 | 752 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 98% |
| Response time | 8 ms | 25 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 80% | 69% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 27.6 mm | 26.8 mm |
| Width | 399.3 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 295.5 mm | 252 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black, Gray, Yellow |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 49.5 dB | 53 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)7.47.4vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsGigabyte Aero 16 OLED BSF RTX 4070 (2023)7.47.7vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU603 RTX 4060 (2023)7.47.5vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.47.6vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios 300 PH317-56 RTX 3060 (2022)7.46.1vsAcer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios 300 PH317-56 RTX 3080 (2022)7.47.2