- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) vs ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)
What Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (8) and where ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Graphics9.7
7.5Overall performance9.4
8.3Display9.3
4.9Memory & storage5.3
4.3Battery & portability3.6
9.0Features & cooling6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)
| Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) | ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 295.5 mm | 266 mm | +29.5 mm |
| Width | 399.3 mm | 355 mm | +44.3 mm |
| Thickness | 27.6 mm | 30 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.7 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): No
- Advanced OptimusYes · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): No
- Thickness27.6 mm vs 30 mm+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 2,000 GB+2%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)49.5 dB vs 56 dB+13%
- Key travel1.8 mm vs 1.7 mm+6%
Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) better than Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)13.4 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS3.4×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light9,368 vs 26,4242.8×
- Video memory6 GB vs 16 GB2.7×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 9,7283.8×
- Brightness500 nits vs 1,100 nits2.2×
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 175 W+25%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 240 Hz+45%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core14,967 vs 19,038+27%
- Response time8 ms vs 3 ms2.7×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,378 vs 1,961+42%
- HDRNo · Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 9,728 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.4 TFLOPS | 45.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 9,368 | 26,424 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 16 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 24 | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 14,967 | 19,038 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,753 | 3,105 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,378 | 1,961 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 1,100 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 8 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 80% | 99% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.67 kg |
| Thickness | 27.6 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 399.3 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 295.5 mm | 266 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 49.5 dB | 56 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 6 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus TUF Gaming A17 FA707 RTX 4060 (2023)7.47.4vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsGigabyte Aero 16 OLED BSF RTX 4070 (2023)7.47.7vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU603 RTX 4060 (2023)7.47.5vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)7.47.6vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios 300 PH317-56 RTX 3060 (2022)7.46.1vsAcer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAcer Predator Helios 300 PH317-56 RTX 3080 (2022)7.47.2