- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73 RTX 5090 (2025) vs Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)
Acer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73 RTX 5090 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)
What Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73 RTX 5090 (2025) does better (3) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Display9.8
4.4Memory & storage2.6
Why is Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Panel typeOLED vs Mini-LED
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) better than Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | — |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 51.4 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 29,638 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.7 kg | — |
| Thickness | 28 mm | — |
| Width | 357 mm | — |
| Depth | 280 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 5 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 2 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 4 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73 RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73 RTX 5090 (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G615 RTX 5080 (2025)9.29.0vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73 RTX 5090 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.29.4vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73 RTX 5090 (2025)vsGigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5080 (2025)9.29.4vs
Acer Predator Helios 16 AI PH16-73 RTX 5090 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 (2025)9.29.0
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)vsXMG Neo 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)8.18.0