Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025) vs MSI Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)
What Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (4) and where Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Memory & storage9.8
3.3Battery & portability2.5
6.7Features & cooling2.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025) | Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 276 mm | = |
| Width | 401 mm | 398 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 28 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.7 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 250 GB4×
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Thickness24 mm vs 28 mm+17%
Why is Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 240 Hz+45%
- RAM (up to)96 GB vs 128 GB+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 4,608 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core i7-14650HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260, Core 9 270H, Ryzen AI 9 365 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 96 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| SSD (up to) | 8,000 GB | 8,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 250 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 75 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.71 kg | 2.7 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 28 mm |
| Width | 401 mm | 398 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 276 mm |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Webcam | — | 720p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
Related comparisons
vs
MSI Cyborg 15 B13 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)6.58.4
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5050 (2025)8.48.6
vs
MSI Cyborg 17 B13W RTX 5060 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)6.08.4
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)8.48.4
vs
Gigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)7.98.4
vs
HP Omen 15 RTX 5060 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)6.88.4

