vs
8.2Display7.0
4.4Memory & storage2.6
3.4Battery & portability8.6
6.7Features & cooling4.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025)
| Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025) | Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 263 mm | +13 mm |
| Width | 401 mm | 358 mm | +43 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 23 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025): No
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 2,560+80%
- Video memory8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Screen size17.3″ vs 16″+8%
Why is Gaming A16 RTX 4050 (2025) better than Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Weight2.71 kg vs 2.2 kg+23%
- Thickness24 mm vs 23 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 2,560 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core i7-13620H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 10 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 4.9 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 365 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 76 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 150 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.71 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 401 mm | 358 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 263 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Webcam | — | 1,080p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 15 B2 RTX 5060 (2025)6.66.6vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)vsMSI Katana 17 HX B14 RTX 5060 (2025)6.66.8
vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)6.36.6
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)8.56.6
vsAcer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)8.16.6vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5050 (2025)6.68.6