Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)
What Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (10) and where TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Graphics7.0
6.6Overall performance7.3
2.7Display6.3
2.9Memory & storage4.6
3.8Battery & portability7.7
7.1Features & cooling6.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)
| Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025) | TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 269 mm | +7 mm |
| Width | 401 mm | 354 mm | +47 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025): No
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 70 Wh+9%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,602 vs 13,288+2%
- Advanced OptimusYes · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025): No
- SD card readerYes · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core954 vs 931+2%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Screen size17.3″ vs 16″+8%
- DCI-P3 coverage42% vs 40%+5%
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- GPU power (TGP)85 W vs 115 W+35%
- GPU compute (FP32)14.7 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS+25%
- Weight2.71 kg vs 2.2 kg+23%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
- Response time36 ms vs 3 ms12×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light11,783 vs 12,792+9%
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Dolby AtmosNo · Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)47 dB vs 39.4 dB+19%
- Pixel density127 ppi vs 142 ppi+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 85 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 14.7 TFLOPS | 18.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 11,783 | 12,792 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Ryzen 7 260 |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260 | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,602 | 13,288 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,639 | 2,651 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 954 | 931 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 61% | 60% |
| Response time | 36 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 42% | 40% |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 70 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.71 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | — |
| Width | 401 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 47 dB | 39.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg A15 AI B2HW RTX 5070 (2025)5.65.8vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg A17 AI RTX 5050 (2025)5.65.5vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Victus 15 RTX 4050 (2025)5.65.4
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.6vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5060 (2025)7.47.5vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)vsGigabyte Gaming A16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.2