Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)
What Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (9) and where TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Graphics7.0
6.6Overall performance7.3
4.0Display6.6
2.8Memory & storage4.4
3.7Battery & portability8.9
7.1Features & cooling7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)
| Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025) | TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 269 mm | +7 mm |
| Width | 401 mm | 354 mm | +47 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 26 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,602 vs 13,288+2%
- Advanced OptimusYes · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025): No
- SD card readerYes · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025): No
- Thickness24 mm vs 26 mm+8%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core954 vs 931+2%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Screen size17.3″ vs 16″+8%
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 5,200 MHz+8%
- DCI-P3 coverage42% vs 40%+5%
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- GPU power (TGP)85 W vs 115 W+35%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- GPU compute (FP32)14.7 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS+25%
- Weight2.71 kg vs 2.2 kg+23%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 165 Hz+15%
- Response time36 ms vs 11 ms3.3×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light11,783 vs 12,792+9%
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Dolby AtmosNo · Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025): Yes
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)47 dB vs 39.4 dB+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 85 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 14.7 TFLOPS | 18.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 11,783 | 12,792 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Ryzen 7 260 |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260 | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,602 | 13,288 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,639 | 2,651 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 954 | 931 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 61% | 60% |
| Response time | 36 ms | 11 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 42% | 40% |
| Pixel density | 127 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.71 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 401 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 47 dB | 39.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 17 B13W RTX 5060 (2025)5.86.0
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)vsLenovo LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5060 (2025)5.85.5
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 15 RTX 5050 (2026)5.85.9
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg A15 AI B2HW RTX 5070 (2025)5.85.8
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Victus 15 RTX 4060 (2025)5.85.6
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5060 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg A17 AI RTX 5060 (2025)5.85.9

