Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025) vs Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5070 (2025)
What Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025) does better (2) and where TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display6.9
2.1Memory & storage3.3
2.8Battery & portability8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025)TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025) | TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 278 mm | 269 mm | +9 mm |
| Width | 361 mm | 354 mm | +7 mm |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 27 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025) better than TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 165 Hz+9%
- Thickness25 mm vs 27 mm+8%
Why is TUF Gaming F16 FX608 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- Battery capacity57 Wh vs 90 Wh+58%
- CPU cores8 vs 162×
- SSD (up to)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.2 kg+14%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores3,328 vs 4,608+38%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- Screen size14″ vs 16″+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 3,328 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | — | 26.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | — | 14,465 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 7 450 | Core i7-14650HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | — | Core i5-13450HX, Core i5-14450HX, Core 5 210H, Core i7-13620H, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core i9-13980HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | — | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | — | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | — | No |
| MUX switch | — | Yes |
| HDR | — | No |
| Touchscreen | — | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | — | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | — | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | — | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | — | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | — | 2 |
| SSD interface | — | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 57 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 25 mm | 27 mm |
| Width | 361 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 278 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | — | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | — | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | — | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | — | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | — | 2 |
| USB-A ports | — | 3 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | — | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | — | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | — | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | — | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | — | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | — | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | — | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Medion Erazer Defender P10 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025)4.04.1
vsMSI VenturePro A17 AI+ A3H RTX 5060 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025)4.04.1vs
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 17 RTX 4070 (2025)4.14.1
vsMedion Erazer Defender 17 P1 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025)3.64.1vs
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41 RTX 4060 (2024)4.14.8
vsLenovo LOQ 15ARP10E RTX 3050 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 5060 (2025)4.24.1