Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)
What Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (7) and where TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Graphics4.2
5.0Overall performance3.6
4.9Display4.9
4.9Memory & storage2.8
3.4Battery & portability8.9
6.1Features & cooling7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 4050 (2024)TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)
| Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 4050 (2024) | TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 278.4 mm | 269 mm | +9.4 mm |
| Width | 361.8 mm | 354 mm | +7.8 mm |
| Thickness | 24.7 mm | 26 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.2 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 4050 (2024) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,029 vs 7,799+3%
- Advanced OptimusYes · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Brightness300 nits vs 250 nits+20%
- Thickness24.7 mm vs 26 mm+5%
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 4050 (2024)?
- Battery capacity57 Wh vs 90 Wh+58%
- Panel typeTN vs IPS
- GPU power (TGP)85 W vs 90 W+6%
- Weight2.5 kg vs 2.2 kg+14%
- Response time7 ms vs 3 ms2.3×
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- USB-C ports1 vs 22×
- Dolby AtmosNo · Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 4050 (2024): Yes
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,072+20%
- CPU cores10 vs 12+20%
- sRGB coverage51% vs 100%+96%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 85 W | 90 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.9 TFLOPS | 10.9 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,029 | 7,799 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 10 | 12 |
| CPU threads | 16 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-14450HX, Core i7-14650HX | Ryzen 7 7445HS, Ryzen 7 170, Ryzen 9 7845HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,357 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,270 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 883 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | TN | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 51% | 100% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 40% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 57 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 24.7 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 361.8 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 278.4 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 39.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.4 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 4050 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.15.3vs
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMSI Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4050 (2024)5.14.8vs
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 4050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)5.15.0
vsAcer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 4050 (2024)3.95.1
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)5.48.1vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5060 (2025)5.47.8