Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5070 (2025) vs HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025)
What Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (12) and where Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025) wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Graphics2.8
7.3Overall performance5.8
4.3Display8.4
5.4Memory & storage5.8
3.1Battery & portability5.2
5.5Features & cooling6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5070 (2025)Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025)
| Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5070 (2025) | Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 260 mm | 234 mm | +26 mm |
| Width | 356.5 mm | 313 mm | +43.5 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 18 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.8 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)20.1 TFLOPS vs 4 TFLOPS5×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light13,376 vs 4,2313.2×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 71 Wh+7%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,328+38%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025): No
- Advanced OptimusYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Screen size16″ vs 14″+14%
Why is Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- CPU cores8 vs 162×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Brightness300 nits vs 500 nits+67%
- Weight2.1 kg vs 1.75 kg+20%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core13,211 vs 15,075+14%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- HDRNo · Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- USB-C ports1 vs 22×
- SD card readerNo · Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 85 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,328 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 20.1 TFLOPS | 4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 13,376 | 4,231 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 260 | Core Ultra 7 255H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen 9 270 | Core Ultra 7 255H, Core Ultra 9 285H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,211 | 15,075 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,541 | 2,680 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 922 | 1,044 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | — | OLED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | — | 0.2 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 243 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 7,467 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 71 Wh |
| Power adapter | 180 W | 140 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.75 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 18 mm |
| Width | 356.5 mm | 313 mm |
| Depth | 260 mm | 234 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 53.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | — | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 14 RTX 5070 (2025)6.56.4
vs
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 14 RTX 5060 (2025)6.56.4
vs
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5070 (2025)vsDell 16 Premium RTX 5070 (2025)6.56.5
vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025)6.46.1
vs
Gigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025)6.06.1
vs
HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 14 RTX 5060 (2025)6.16.4
