NewLenovo LOQ 15IRH11E RTX 3050 (2026) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
pan.tfgaming laptops, spec by spec
  1. pan.tf
  2. Compare
  3. Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5070 (2025) vs LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Lenovo LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)

What Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (10) and where LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026) wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5070 (2025)
7.3Score
10 advantages≈ $1,450
Higher score
vs
Lenovo LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)
7.0Score
6 advantages≈ $1,400
7.4Graphics6.6
7.0Overall performance6.1
7.6Display6.9
3.6Memory & storage2.8
5.0Battery & portability8.0
6.9Features & cooling7.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5070 (2025)LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)
360 × 27625345 × 25523
Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5070 (2025)LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)Difference
Depth276 mm255 mm+21 mm
Width360 mm345 mm+15 mm
Thickness25 mm23 mm+2 mm
Weight2.4 kg2.1 kg+0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5070 (2025) better than LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026)?

  1. RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
  2. Battery capacity76 Wh vs 60 Wh+27%
  3. Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
  4. GPU compute (FP32)22.1 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS+20%
  5. 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,045 vs 11,736+20%
  6. Refresh rate180 Hz vs 165 Hz+9%
  7. GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,328+38%
  8. SD card readerYes · LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026): No
  9. SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
  10. Screen size16″ vs 15.3″+5%

Why is LOQ 15 G11 RTX 5060 (2026) better than Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5070 (2025)?

  1. GPU power (TGP)95 W vs 115 W+21%
  2. Weight2.44 kg vs 2.1 kg+16%
  3. CPU cores6 vs 8+33%
  4. Webcam720p vs 1,440p2×
  5. Thickness25 mm vs 23 mm+9%
  6. Pixel density138 ppi vs 148 ppi+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Graphics
Graphics cardGeForce RTX 5070 LaptopGeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
GPU makerNVIDIANVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)95 W115 W
Video memory8 GB8 GB
Video memory typeGDDR7GDDR7
GPU shader cores4,6083,328
GPU compute (FP32)22.1 TFLOPS18.4 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,04511,736
Processor
ProcessorRyzen 9 270Core Ultra 7 355
CPU makerAMDIntel
CPU cores68
CPU threads—8
Max CPU clock5 GHz5.1 GHz
Processor optionsRyzen 7 260, Ryzen 9 270Core i5-13450HX, Core i7-13645HX, Ryzen 7 250, Core Ultra 7 355
Geekbench 6 multi-core—11,489
Geekbench 6 single-core—2,757
Cinebench 2024 multi-core—760
Display
Screen size16″15.3″
Resolution2560 × 16001920 × 1200
Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p)Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate180 Hz165 Hz
Panel typeIPSIPS
Brightness300 nits300 nits
sRGB coverage—100%
Response time—9 ms
DCI-P3 coverage—79%
Pixel density138 ppi148 ppi
Aspect ratio16:1016:10
G-Sync / FreeSyncYesYes
Advanced OptimusYesYes
MUX switchYesYes
HDRNoNo
TouchscreenNoNo
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)32 GB16 GB
RAM (base)16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5DDR5
RAM speed5,600 MHz5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM slots22
Upgradable RAMYesYes
SSD (up to)1,000 GB1,000 GB
SSD (base)1,000 GB512 GB
M.2 SSD slots22
SSD interfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity76 Wh60 Wh
Power adapter135 W245 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)YesYes
USB-C charging power100 W100 W
Design & cooling
Weight2.44 kg2.1 kg
Thickness25 mm23 mm
Width360 mm345 mm
Depth276 mm255 mm
Body materialPlasticPlastic
ColoursBlackGrey
Cooling fans22
Vapor chamber coolingNoNo
Liquid metal (CPU)NoNo
Fan noise (max. load)50 dB50 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4USB4Thunderbolt 4
Thunderbolt or USB4YesYes
USB-C ports11
USB-A ports33
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1YesYes
(Mini) DisplayPortNoNo
Ethernet1 Gbit/s1 Gbit/s
Ethernet portYesYes
SD card readerYesNo
3.5 mm audio jackYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.3
Keyboard & camera
Keyboard backlight—Zone RGB
Per-key RGB—No
Backlit keyboardYesYes
Numeric keypadYesYes
Key travel—1.6 mm
Webcam720p1,440p
IR camera (face login)NoNo
Fingerprint readerNoNo
Audio
Speakers2 speakers2 speakers
Dolby AtmosNoNo
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare