Acer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026) vs MSI Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026)
What Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026) does better (3) and where Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026) wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.5Memory & storage2.7
7.0Battery & portability8.3
2.2Features & cooling2.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026)
| Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026) | Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 240 mm | 249 mm | −9 mm |
| Width | 362 mm | 359 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 23 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026) better than Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026)?
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
Why is Cyborg 15 C13W RTX 5050 (2026) better than Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)?
- Battery capacity57 Wh vs 60 Wh+5%
- Max. supported RAM16 GB vs 96 GB6×
- Weight2.1 kg vs 1.98 kg+6%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Thickness24 mm vs 23 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 7445HS | Core i5-13420H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | — | 4.6 GHz |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 16 GB | 96 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 57 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 150 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.98 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Width | 362 mm | 359 mm |
| Depth | 240 mm | 249 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Zone RGB |
| Per-key RGB | — | No |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)6.45.1
vs
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)8.15.1
vs
Asus TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)5.55.1
vs
Alienware 15 RTX 5050 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)5.25.1
vs
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-72 RTX 5060 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)5.05.1
vs
Alienware 15 RTX 4050 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)4.85.1

