Acer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026) vs Lenovo LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 3050 (2026)
What Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026) does better (7) and where LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 3050 (2026) wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Display5.0
2.4Memory & storage2.3
7.0Battery & portability5.5
2.2Features & cooling2.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 3050 (2026)
| Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026) | LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 3050 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 240 mm | 256 mm | −16 mm |
| Width | 362 mm | 361 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 25 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2.3 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026) better than LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 3050 (2026)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Video memory6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Weight2.1 kg vs 2.3 kg+10%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- Thickness24 mm vs 25 mm+4%
Why is LOQ Essential 15 G11 RTX 3050 (2026) better than Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)?
- Battery capacity57 Wh vs 60 Wh+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 7 7445HS | Core 7 230H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| Processor options | — | Core 5 205H, Core 7 230H |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — |
| Panel type | — | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | — | 5,200 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 16 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 57 Wh | 60 Wh |
| Power adapter | — | 135 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 24 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 362 mm | 361 mm |
| Depth | 240 mm | 256 mm |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | — | Yes |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 720p |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)8.45.0
vs
Acer Nitro V 17 AI ANV17-41 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)6.35.0
vs
Asus TUF Gaming 16 FX610 RTX 5050 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)5.55.0
vs
Alienware 15 RTX 5050 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)5.25.0
vs
Lenovo LOQ 17 G10 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)5.05.0
vs
Alienware 15 RTX 3050 (2026)vsAcer Nitro V 15 AI ANV15-42 RTX 4050 (2026)4.25.0

