Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025) vs Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)
What Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025) does better (11) and where TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (20) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Graphics7.7
4.5Overall performance7.8
5.2Display6.6
4.9Memory & storage4.4
8.5Battery & portability8.9
7.6Features & cooling7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025)TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025) | TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 236.8 mm | 269 mm | −32.2 mm |
| Width | 325.7 mm | 354 mm | −28.3 mm |
| Thickness | 21.9 mm | 26 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Weight | 1.7 kg | 2.2 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025) better than TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Weight1.74 kg vs 2.2 kg+26%
- Advanced OptimusYes · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- SD card readerYes · TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Thickness21.9 mm vs 26 mm+19%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- DCI-P3 coverage69% vs 40%+73%
- sRGB coverage100% vs 60%+67%
- Response time7 ms vs 11 ms+57%
- Pixel density156 ppi vs 142 ppi+10%
- Geekbench 6 single-core2,900 vs 2,651+9%
Why is TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)8.2 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS3.2×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light6,170 vs 14,9472.4×
- Battery capacity57 Wh vs 90 Wh+58%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core10,894 vs 13,288+22%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core693 vs 931+34%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- CPU cores6 vs 8+33%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | — | 115 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 8.2 TFLOPS | 26.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 6,170 | 14,947 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 5 340 | Ryzen 7 260 |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 6 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 12 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 5 340, Ryzen AI 7 350 | Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen 9 8940HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 10,894 | 13,288 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,900 | 2,651 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 693 | 931 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14.5″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 60% |
| Response time | 7 ms | 11 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 69% | 40% |
| Pixel density | 156 ppi | 142 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 57 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.74 kg | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 21.9 mm | 26 mm |
| Width | 325.7 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 236.8 mm | 269 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | White | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 1 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 57 dB | 39.4 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | No | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025)vsXMG Apex 17 RTX 5060 (2025)5.75.6vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025)vsXMG Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)5.75.8vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg A15 AI B2HW RTX 5070 (2025)5.75.8vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-62 RTX 4050 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-71 RTX 4060 (2024)5.75.5