Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024) vs Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
What Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024) does better (5) and where Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Memory & storage2.6
8.7Battery & portability4.0
8.2Features & cooling8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024)Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)
| Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024) | Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 234 mm | 272 mm | −38 mm |
| Width | 328 mm | 383 mm | −55 mm |
| Thickness | 21 mm | 33 mm | −12 mm |
| Weight | 1.7 kg | 2.9 kg | −1.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024) better than Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)?
- Weight1.7 kg vs 2.86 kg+68%
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Thickness21 mm vs 33 mm+57%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024) better than Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024)?
- Battery capacity57 Wh vs 100 Wh+75%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- GPU shader cores2,048 vs 7,4243.6×
- CPU cores6 vs 244×
- Video memory6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- Screen size14.5″ vs 17.3″+19%
- Max CPU clock5 GHz vs 5.6 GHz+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 60 W | — |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 7,424 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 6.1 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 4,243 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Core i9-14900HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 6 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS | Core i9-13900HX, Core i9-14900HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,031 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,671 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 724 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14.5″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 156 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 57 Wh | 100 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.7 kg | 2.86 kg |
| Thickness | 21 mm | 33 mm |
| Width | 328 mm | 383 mm |
| Depth | 234 mm | 272 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | White | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | No | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)5.35.4vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.35.3vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)5.35.0vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 3050 (2024)vsAcer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023)5.33.9
vs
Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X25 RTX 3080 (2022)5.47.2vs
Medion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X20 RTX 3070 (2022)5.45.7