Acer Nitro Lite 16 RTX 4050 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Nitro Lite 16 RTX 4050 (2025) does better (3) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.5Memory & storage2.6
Why is Nitro Lite 16 RTX 4050 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Nitro Lite 16 RTX 4050 (2025)?
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 300 Hz+82%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 5,8882.3×
- Video memory6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 65 W | — |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 9.6 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 7,291 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-13420H | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.6 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core i5-13420H, Core i7-13620H | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,556 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,256 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 528 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 99 Wh |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 65 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.95 kg | — |
| Thickness | 22.9 mm | — |
| Width | 362.2 mm | — |
| Depth | 248.5 mm | — |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | White, Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro Lite 16 RTX 4050 (2025)vsMSI Cyborg 17 B13W RTX 5060 (2025)6.06.0vs
Acer Nitro Lite 16 RTX 4050 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Nitro Lite 16 RTX 4050 (2025)vsXMG Apex 17 RTX 5070 (2025)6.05.8
vs
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
vsAsus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)