pan.tf
Compare
Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020) vs Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)

Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020) vs HP Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)

What Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020) does better (3) and where Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023) wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Acer · 2020Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020)

4.7Score

3 advantages≈ $1,150

HP · 2023Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)

4.9Score

8 advantages≈ $1,000

Higher score

2.4Memory & storage2.9

9.1Battery & portability7.2

2.1Features & cooling4.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020)Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)

	Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020)	Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)	Difference
Depth	280 mm	259 mm	+21 mm
Width	404 mm	369 mm	+35 mm
Thickness	25 mm	23 mm	+2 mm
Weight	2.2 kg	2.3 kg	−0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020) better than Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)?

Weight2.2 kg vs 2.33 kg+6%
Video memory8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
Screen size17.3″ vs 16.1″+7%

Why is Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020)?

RAM (up to)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
GPU shader cores1,024 vs 2,5602.5×
CPU cores4 vs 123×
RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
RAM typeDDR4 vs DDR5
Thickness25 mm vs 23 mm+9%
Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
Max CPU clock4.5 GHz vs 4.7 GHz+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020)≈ $1,1504.7	HP Victus 16 RTX 4050 (2023)≈ $1,0004.9
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Laptop	GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	—	120 W
Video memory	8 GB	6 GB
Video memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
GPU shader cores	1,024	2,560
GPU compute (FP32)	—	12.1 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	—	7,998
Processor
Processor	Core i5-10300H	Core i5-13500H
CPU maker	Intel	Intel
CPU cores	4	12
Max CPU clock	4.5 GHz	4.7 GHz
Processor options	—	Core i5-13500HX, Ryzen 5 7640HS, Core i7-13700H, Core i7-13700HX, Ryzen 7 7840HS
Display
Screen size	17.3″	16.1″
Resolution	1920 × 1080	1920 × 1080
Resolution class	Full HD (1080p/1200p)	Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Panel type	—	IPS
Brightness	—	250 nits
sRGB coverage	—	98%
Response time	—	7 ms
DCI-P3 coverage	—	67%
Pixel density	—	137 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:9	16:9
G-Sync / FreeSync	—	Yes
Advanced Optimus	—	Yes
MUX switch	—	Yes
HDR	—	No
Touchscreen	—	No
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	8 GB	16 GB
RAM (base)	8 GB	16 GB
RAM type	DDR4	DDR5
RAM speed	—	4,800 MHz
Max. supported RAM	—	32 GB
RAM slots	2	2
Upgradable RAM	Yes	Yes
SSD (up to)	1,000 GB	1,000 GB
SSD (base)	1,000 GB	1,000 GB
M.2 SSD slots	—	2
SSD interface	—	PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity	—	70 Wh
Power adapter	135 W	230 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	—	Yes
Design & cooling
Weight	2.2 kg	2.33 kg
Thickness	25 mm	23 mm
Width	404 mm	369 mm
Depth	280 mm	259 mm
Body material	—	Plastic
Colours	Black	Black
Cooling fans	—	2
Vapor chamber cooling	—	No
Liquid metal (CPU)	—	No
Fan noise (max. load)	—	55.3 dB
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt or USB4	No	No
USB-C ports	—	1
USB-A ports	—	3
HDMI	—	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	—	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	—	No
Ethernet	1 Gbit/s	1 Gbit/s
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	—	Yes
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5	5.3
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	—	Yes
Numeric keypad	Yes	Yes
Webcam	720p	720p
IR camera (face login)	—	No
Fingerprint reader	—	No
Audio
Speakers	—	2 speakers
Dolby Atmos	—	No

Related comparisons

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44 GTX 1650 Ti (2020)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020)4.94.7

Alienware m17 R3 RTX 2070 (2020)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020)4.94.7

Alienware m17 R3 RX 5500M (2020)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020)4.44.7

Dell G3 15 3500 RTX 2070 (2020)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020)4.44.7

Alienware m17 R3 RTX 2060 (2020)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020)4.64.7

Alienware m17 R3 GTX 1660 Ti (2020)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-52 GTX 1650 Ti (2020)4.64.7