Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023) vs Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)
What Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023) does better (6) and where TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.4Display4.2
7.5Memory & storage2.4
2.9Battery & portability9.4
7.8Features & cooling6.4
Why is Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 16 GB4×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- CPU cores14 vs 8+75%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Screen size17.3″ vs 16″+8%
- Max CPU clock5 GHz vs 4.8 GHz+4%
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023)?
- Weight3 kg vs 2.27 kg+32%
- GPU shader cores2,048 vs 2,560+25%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 95 W | — |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 7.9 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 5,605 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13700H | Core 5 210H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i7-13700H, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 12,420 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,748 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 813 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17.3″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 131 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.27 kg |
| Thickness | 28.9 mm | — |
| Width | 400.2 mm | — |
| Depth | 293.3 mm | — |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54.7 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.4 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)5.76.1vs
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsMSI Katana 15 B13 RTX 4070 (2023)5.76.0vs
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsDell G15 5530 RTX 4060 (2023)5.75.4vs
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN515-57 RTX 3070 (2022)5.75.1vs
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 16 RTX 4050 (2023)5.75.6vs
Acer Nitro 17 AN17-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsAcer Nitro 5 AN517-55 RTX 3050 (2022)5.74.8