Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025) vs HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)
What Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (14) and where Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Graphics3.5
7.9Overall performance5.4
6.6Display8.4
2.6Memory & storage2.2
2.1Battery & portability5.2
4.9Features & cooling7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)
| Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025) | Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 234 mm | +42 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 313 mm | +44 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 18 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 1.8 kg | +1.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 10.7 TFLOPS2.4×
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 65 W+77%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,184 vs 7,977+78%
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 120 Hz+50%
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 71 Wh+7%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,072+50%
- Ethernet5 Gbit/s vs 1 Gbit/s5×
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- M.2 SSD slots2 vs 12×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
Why is Omen Transcend 14 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- Weight2.81 kg vs 1.75 kg+61%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- CPU cores10 vs 16+60%
- Response time9 ms vs 0.2 ms45×
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- HDRNo · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- IR camera (face login)No · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Thickness20 mm vs 18 mm+11%
- RAM speed5,600 MHz vs 7,467 MHz+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 65 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 10.7 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,184 | 7,977 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 7 155H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 16 |
| CPU threads | — | 22 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 7 155H, Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 12,402 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,385 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 942 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 14″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2880 × 1800 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 9 ms | 0.2 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 243 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 7,467 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 1 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 71 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 140 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | — | 140 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.81 kg | 1.75 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 18 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 313 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 234 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 51.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025)6.46.1vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5060 (2025)6.46.0vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 14 RTX 5070 (2025)6.46.4vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 16S AI ANV16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)6.45.4vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 14 RTX 5060 (2025)6.46.4vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5050 (2025)6.46.1