Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025) vs Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024)
What Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025) does better (15) and where Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024) wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Graphics5.6
7.9Overall performance6.9
6.6Display5.9
2.6Memory & storage3.4
2.1Battery & portability3.6
4.9Features & cooling7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024)
| Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025) | Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 276 mm | 235.3 mm | +40.7 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 355.7 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 19.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 1.9 kg | +0.9 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024)?
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 60 Hz3×
- GPU compute (FP32)26.2 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS+90%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light14,184 vs 9,751+45%
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 110 W+5%
- GPU shader cores4,608 vs 3,072+50%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- Advanced OptimusYes · Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024): No
- SSD (base)1,000 GB vs 512 GB+95%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
Why is Vivobook Pro 15 OLED Q543 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB2×
- Weight2.81 kg vs 1.9 kg+48%
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- CPU cores10 vs 16+60%
- Brightness400 nits vs 600 nits+50%
- Response time9 ms vs 1 ms9×
- HDRNo · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- IR camera (face login)No · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Webcam1,080p vs 1,440p+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 110 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 4,608 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.2 TFLOPS | 13.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 14,184 | 9,751 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| CPU maker | AMD | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 16 |
| CPU threads | — | 22 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 13,643 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,402 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 981 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 15.6″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 600 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 9 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 141 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 24 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 1 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,048 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 75 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.81 kg | 1.9 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 19.9 mm |
| Width | 357 mm | 355.7 mm |
| Depth | 276 mm | 235.3 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | 5 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.4 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5060 (2025)6.46.1vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5060 (2025)6.46.0vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 14 RTX 5070 (2025)6.46.4vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Nitro V 16S AI ANV16S-71 RTX 5070 (2025)6.45.4vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 14 RTX 5060 (2025)6.46.4vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)6.47.1